Controversy Erupts Over Proposed Traveller Site in Chilterns
Plans for a controversial Traveller site in the Chilterns, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in Oxfordshire, England, have ignited a fierce debate among local residents. The proposal involves transforming a parcel of land in the parish of Swyncombe, near Henley-on-Thames, into a permanent base for a Traveller family. A retrospective planning application has been submitted to the South Oxfordshire District Council, seeking approval for the existing development.
Details of the Application
The application requests permission for a static caravan and a touring caravan to be situated on the land near Digberry Farm. The site would also include parking facilities and grazing space for horses. Additional infrastructure outlined in the application encompasses a septic tank, hardstanding ground, fencing, a substantial metal storage box (weighing nearly 150kg), and a charging point for electric bicycles.
Arguments in Favor: An "Eco-Friendly" Solution?
The agent representing the landowner contends that the development is environmentally conscious. Their argument centers on the idea that providing a permanent base for the Traveller family will reduce their overall travel, leading to a decrease in private car usage and a greater benefit to sustainability. They suggest that minimizing the need for constant relocation will ultimately lower the family's carbon footprint. Furthermore, proponents argue that a designated site could alleviate the issues often associated with unauthorized encampments, such as legal costs and potential friction with local communities.
Local Opposition: Noise, Disruption, and Environmental Concerns
Despite the arguments in favor, the proposal has met with significant resistance from residents of Swyncombe and surrounding areas. A primary concern revolves around noise pollution generated by the site, particularly from a generator that operates at night. Objectors argue that the noise disrupts the peace and tranquility that residents value in the rural setting. One resident stated the noise is "blighting the community, particularly at night," and represents a "major and unmitigated intrusion into our lives."
Beyond noise, concerns extend to the potential ecological impacts of the development. Residents fear that lighting and generator noise will negatively affect nocturnal species, such as bats. The removal of hedgerows, as indicated in the application, also raises concerns about the disruption of habitats for breeding birds.
The "Fait Accompli" and Planning Procedures
A significant point of contention is the retrospective nature of the planning application. Residents express frustration that the landowner proceeded with the development before obtaining the necessary approvals, presenting the community with what they perceive as a "fait accompli." The sentiment is that the proper planning procedures were bypassed, undermining the established system intended to protect the community and the environment.
The Significance of the Chilterns Landscape
The parish of Swyncombe, with a population of approximately 250 people, lies within the Chilterns National Landscape, a protected conservation area recognized for its outstanding natural beauty. Residents emphasize the importance of preserving the area's rural character and environmental integrity. The proposed site is located on land that was once part of Springalls Plantation, an ancient woodland dating back to 1627. The woodland is subject to a tree preservation order, and a campaign group, Save Springalls, has been actively working to protect the area.
Previous Planning Application and Appeal
This isn't the first time the landowner has sought to develop the site. A previous planning application, submitted in March of the previous year, proposed changing the land's use from agricultural to equestrian, including the construction of a stable block and a new access point. This application was rejected in May, and a subsequent appeal was dismissed. The rejection cited concerns that the development would "fundamentally and harmfully change the existing open and rural character of the site" and "fail to conserve or enhance the landscape." The council specifically highlighted the value of the existing treescape and native hedging.
A Personal Connection to the Land
One local resident, who identifies as part Traveller/Romany, expressed his disappointment with the development. He emphasizes that the traditional Traveller philosophy is to live in harmony with nature, a stark contrast to what he perceives as the developers' actions. He highlighted the damage caused by the removal of topsoil, which he described as a biodiverse ecosystem that had been undisturbed for many years. He said, "I am part Traveller/Romany and I know their philosophy was to live with nature, not against it as these developers are doing."
Community Concerns and Intimidation
Residents have voiced concerns about a sense of intimidation within the community. Some feel hesitant to speak out against the development for fear of repercussions. The resident quoted earlier said, "Certainly when I'm walking past it, the houses around that area will notice it...They're quite scared as well, there's a feeling of intimidation."
Policy Violations and Community Harm
In his official objection, the resident argued that the application violates both the Oxfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework, particularly regarding the protection of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, biodiversity, heritage, and highway safety. He concluded by stating that the application has caused "genuine harm and anger in the local community."
The Council's Position
South Oxfordshire District Council has declined to comment on the application, citing the ongoing nature of the planning process. The consultation period for the application is open until September 19th, allowing residents and other stakeholders to submit their comments and objections. The council will then consider all the evidence before making a decision on the future of the proposed Traveller site.
No comments:
Post a Comment