How a Heroic Prison Worker's Injury Led to a Big Payout in Ireland

Prison Worker's Heroic Act Leads to Major WorkCover Settlement

A prison maintenance officer who tackled an escaping inmate has received a significant WorkCover payout after a court found his employer at fault for failing to provide proper training. The case highlights the importance of adequate safety protocols in high-risk environments.

Glen Smits, a dedicated maintenance worker at Fulham Prison in Victoria’s Gippsland region, suffered a severe spinal injury when he was ordered to tackle a prisoner attempting to escape. The incident led to three surgeries and the implantation of a spinal cord stimulator to manage his chronic pain. Despite the risks, Mr. Smits’ actions were seen as heroic by many, though his employers initially tried to portray him as acting outside his responsibilities.

The Gippsland jury delivered a landmark WorkCover verdict in the Latrobe Valley Civil Circuit, awarding substantial compensation to Mr. Smits. While the exact details of the settlement remain confidential, it is understood that the total cost, including legal fees, will exceed $1 million. The case was handled by the Traralgon team at Arnold Thomas & Becker, with Marita Snipe leading the legal team and Bethany Hourigan guiding the first-ever jury trial for her.

A Critical Failure in Training

Lawyers representing the Victorian WorkCover Authority had initially supported The GEO Group, the private operator of the jail, arguing that Mr. Smits had acted recklessly. However, this argument fell apart when the defense failed to produce any documentation showing that maintenance staff had ever received training on how to respond during an escape attempt.

The lack of proper procedures was a key factor in the jury’s decision. They rejected the claim that Mr. Smits had acted without guidance, instead finding that his employer had failed to provide essential training. While the jury acknowledged a small degree of contributory negligence on Mr. Smits’ part, they ultimately ruled in his favor.

Marita Snipe, the lead lawyer, emphasized the significance of the ruling. “Our client suffered a catastrophic spinal injury while responding to an emergency situation at his workplace,” she said. “The jury carefully considered the evidence and ultimately rejected the suggestion that Mr. Smits was acting outside his responsibilities without proper guidance.”

She added that the outcome sends a strong message to employers about the need for clear training and procedures. “Where employees may be placed in harm’s way, clear training and procedures are essential,” she said. “This verdict reinforces that workers should not be left without direction when confronted with serious risks in the course of their employment.”

A Meaningful Victory for Mr. Smits

Bethany Hourigan, who conducted the trial, described the result as meaningful for Mr. Smits after a long and challenging legal battle. “This case was strongly defended, so achieving this verdict was very meaningful for our client. The jury clearly recognized the long-term impact that these injuries have had on his life,” she said.

The case has also drawn attention to the dangers faced by support staff in prisons and the need for better safety measures. Fulham Prison, which is privately operated, has been involved in several controversial incidents over the years. In 2012, prisoners rioted over changes to their daily routines. In 2016, two inmates escaped but were soon recaptured. More recently, in 2022, a prison supervisor was found to have used unreasonable force against a remand prisoner.

The facility has also experienced prisoner-on-prisoner violence, staff injuries from brawls, and several deaths in custody. These incidents have raised concerns about the safety and treatment of both prisoners and staff. WorkSafe Victoria declined to comment on the specific incident, citing privacy reasons. Daily Mail contacted The GEO Group for a response but did not receive one in time for publication.

Share :