The Accusation Against Kurdish Groups
US President Donald Trump has made controversial claims about Kurdish groups in the Middle East, accusing them of withholding weapons that were meant for Iranian demonstrators. These allegations have sparked a significant debate and raised questions about the relationship between the US and Kurdish factions.
In early March, during the initial phase of the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, Trump expressed his hope that Iranian Kurdish forces based in Iraq would launch attacks against the Islamic clerical regime in Tehran. This statement was followed by another in the subsequent month, where he claimed that the United States had attempted to send weapons to protesters inside Iran through Kurdish intermediaries.
"We sent guns to the protesters, a lot of them," Trump stated. "And I think the Kurds took the guns." Later in May, he expressed disappointment in the Kurds, claiming that Washington had sent "some guns with ammunition, and they were supposed to be delivered, but they kept it."
Denials from Kurdish Factions
DW has spoken to sources from several Kurdish factions in Iraq, Turkey, and Syria, who have all denied receiving any weapons from the US. Iranian Kurdish leaders, including those from the Free Life Party of Kurdistan (PJAK), an armed militant group, have also rejected the White House's narrative.
The leadership of these organizations views Trump's statements as both logistically impossible and politically damaging. Fariba Mohammadi, Deputy Secretary-General of the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, described the allegations as pure "psychological warfare." She emphasized that such weapons have never reached Kurdish political parties or forces, suggesting that the resurgence of these claims is better analyzed within the framework of political pressure rather than the reality on the ground.
Adib Vatandoust, a Central Committee member of Komala (Communist Party of Iran), stated that his organization has not received "a single bullet, nor even a negligible cent." He characterized the alleged operation as a project serving the US and Israeli agendas rather than the genuine democratic interests of the Kurdish people.
Mustafa Mouloudi, Deputy Secretary-General of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (KDPI), highlighted the logistical challenges of the accusations. He pointed out that the heavily militarized borders, the pervasive presence of Iranian security forces, and the strict security agreements recently cemented between Tehran and Baghdad make such cross-border arms transfers virtually impossible.
Understanding the Kurdish Population
Experts argue that Trump's rhetoric exposes his fundamental lack of understanding of Kurdish political society. The US president refers to "the Kurds" as if they were a single, unified proxy force awaiting orders from Washington. In reality, the Kurdish population of over 30 million people is spread across several countries — primarily Iran, Iraq, Turkey, and Syria.
Each country has its own intricate political landscape, diverse ideological parties ranging from leftist to conservative, and unique regional dynamics. Dr. Kamran Matin, Associate Professor of International Relations at the University of Sussex, highlighted the danger of this ignorance.
"Trump has a very limited understanding of both Kurdish society and politics. By blaming the Kurds collectively, while neglecting the multiplicity of Kurdish actors, parties, and regions, he redirects and inflames anti-war and anti-American public opinion against the Kurds, which could lead to dangerous attacks on them," he told DW.
Why Are These Claims Being Made Now?
Experts suggest that Trump's disputed claims about weapons deliveries are a classic case of political deflection. Kamal Chomani, Editor-in-Chief of the Middle East-focused Amargi magazine, draws a parallel to the "Golden Calf" in the Bible — a story about leadership failures and shifting blame.
Chomani argues that Trump, heavily influenced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, operated on the flawed, overly optimistic assumption that the Iranian regime was on the verge of imminent collapse. When that collapse failed to materialize, Trump needed a scapegoat.
"To cover up this failure, Trump uses the Kurds as a 'Golden Calf,'" Chomani explained. "No weapons were sent to the Kurds to be transferred to Iranians inside the country; as we saw, even delivering Starlink satellite internet faced severe difficulties, let alone weapons," he added.
Matin echoed this assessment: "Trump tries to justify the failure of his war on Iran to achieve any of its key objectives by blaming the Kurds." The US president also "tries to blame the Kurds for his failure to deliver on his promise to Iranian protesters that he would come to their aid when they were being massacred by the Iranian regime," he added.
No comments:
Post a Comment